Since I began blogging seven years ago on Word press and Blogger some of the ideas have caught the fancy of many on far off shores. Encouraged by such responses, this blogger is encouraged now to put forth a new idea that is concerned directly with the health and beauty of our lovely planet. It is called the 1:20 Green earth Initiative here, or one may call it the Twenty-Twenty Tree Initiative.
Very simply put the idea is that it may be prescribed by law that every person who possesses or controls land of one acre or more shall ensure that he or she plants a least twenty trees per acre on his land. This law, wherever implemented in a region, province or country would apply to all individual land owners as well as organizations such as farms, homes, schools, universities, industries, trusts etc. if they own or control a piece of land of one acre or more through lease or grant. Actually a far larger number of trees can be planted on an acre of land. This law merely prescribes the minimum. In his home this author presently has more than twenty trees and a home on less than one tenth of an acre and there is a driveway and two lawns besides.
While many initiatives are afoot around the planet to increase tree cover such initiatives have lagged behind the deforestation that has been taking place on the planet over the last century. The present initiative would add oomph to such attempts and help improve climate stabilization efforts. The law briefly put would be something as follows:
Every person or organization that possesses an acre or more of land shall ensure that at least twenty trees of a height of at least ten feet from the ground grow on this land. Those following short of this prescribed minimum shall pay an annual tree deficit tax proportional to the number of trees that are short of twenty. In the first five years after this act is promulgated the height of the counted tree may be less than ten feet.
It is not necessary that the trees be distributed evenly on land. Thus a farmer with a ten acre lot can plant an orchard of 200 fruit trees in a corner of his farm to satisfy the requirement. The location of trees and the choice of trees are up to the owner and farmers may prefer timber or fruit trees. In case they wish to harvest the timber at some later stage they may, provided they have planted or otherwise have more than twenty trees to begin with on their land. Some thought has to be given to the appropriate and simple implementation of this law because a law that is not implemented is only a piece of paper. An easy implementation is possible through a voluntary counting and submission of number of trees on their plot in January of every year. They should retain a receipt of this submission because if a surprise random check is made and the submission found to be incorrect there would be a penalty. Half the penalty would be a reward for the person who reports them. Certainly there would be several details of this law that would need to be worked out but that can be done quickly by a group of experts assembled for the purpose, once the idea is accepted. This blogger shall volunteer to be a part of such a group, if necessary, if called to do so by any region within feasible traveling distance.
If farm owners may be obliged to reserve a portion of their farms for trees that could well be fruit orchards. One disadvantage of orchards as compared to natural forests is that they are low on bio-diversity and as a result they do not contribute as much to improvements in environment as natural forests. However there is a very simple way to improve both the environment as well as fruit yield from orchards by introducing bio-diversity. If twenty per cent of evenly distributed trees are different from the primary crop in an orchard then both the yield and the environment improves. Such orchards may yield up to one and half times the normal yield over the life of the orchard as per the author’s estimate just because of improved bio diversity and soil health despite the fact that there are fewer trees of the primary crop. In addition there is the joy of a different fruit for the personal consumption and distribution by the owner if not the market. All that has to be ensured is that the other trees are not taller or wider in girth than the primary orchard tree. If some or all of the other 20 percent trees are nitrogen fixing trees the gain is likely to be greater (read this http://permaculturenews.org/2008/09/29/nitrogen-fixing-trees-the-multipurpose-pioneers/).
Quite frequently, seeded by animal, bird or breeze a wild tree will come up naturally within an orchard. It is a good idea to leave it in and nurture it as one of the fifth trees. Being natural to the area it will contribute most to bio-diversity. Allowing or introducing wild flowers, berry bushes and mushrooms through the orchard would be even better. The bees will love the flowers and multiply faster. In orchard spaces exceeding ten acres in area do consider a pond with a stream leading to it meandering through the orchard with some fish of an edible variety in it to create the ideal ecology and ground water table as befits our wonderful planet.
Trees that can attract bees to nest are an additional bonus for pollination and that occasional jar of honey to brighten up breakfast and the after dinner desert and health of the farmer and his family. It may be mentioned that neither the fruit nor the honey from single source orchards has the same health benefits as that from a bio-diverse source. The same strategy is recommended for palm and olive oil plantations. Farmers into organic farming may label their produce as organic and ‘from a bio-diverse orchard’ for that additional oomph in their marketing.
To create such an orchard, just plant every fifth tree in a row of a different fruit or timber. In an existing orchard selected trees may be removed to be replaced by others and when a forest is cleared for a plantation just leave in some original trees so that in the end one fifth the trees are the original ones.
Amendment for small plots
While the twenty-twenty tree initiative prescribes minimum growth of trees on large plots of land, the Tweety amendment is the suggested amendment for small plots that are smaller than one acre. Here a minimum requirement of one tree for every two hundred square yards of land may be prescribed under the same initiative with similar fines for not growing them. Thus a person owning 800 square yards of land in an urban, suburban or rural area would be required to grow at least four trees on it that are taller than ten feet in height. Tweety amendment is just the name given here. One can easily choose another if one wishes but it will certainly get tweety birds singing to home owners every morning.
Additional Notes about trees:
1. A brief note on how to select a tree to grow is here http://ezinearticles.com/?How-To-Select-A-Tree-To-Grow&id=7027748
2. The spiritual impact of planting trees is here http://nainitalgoddess.blogspot.in/2013/10/babaji-and-trees.html
3 The influence of planting trees on climate change is here http://steamcenter.blogspot.in/2013/07/one-fact-about-climate-change-most.html
Frequently asked Questions:
Q: I own 1.359 acres of suburban land. If this initiative becomes law in my area, how many trees will I be required to plant?
Ans: 1.359 x 20 = 27.18, the required number of trees is 27
Q: I own a ten acre farm. In case this law comes into force I would hate to shade my farm. Can I just choose small lime and lemon trees and crowd them in a corner of the farm?
Ans: You sure can, provided they all reach at least a height of ten feet. However do not crowd them so much that you can not reach the lemons
Q: I own a commercial plot of 200 square yards in the marketplace and have constructed all of it for my shop. It is permitted in commercial areas of my city. I really have no space for any tree. What should I do?
Ans: If your business is making good money you do not have to do anything, just pay the annual tax for a single tree deficit. If your business is not doing well and you cannot afford to pay even that tax, then pull down the business premises and grow fruit trees on it instead. You will at least get to eat the fruit.
Q: I have a small urban dwelling on 330 square yards and I have paved the entire front portion. What shall I do?
Ans: All you need to do is break a two feet circle in it, pull out the rubble, replace with good soil and compost and plant a tree in it. Your home will look prettier.